If one wants to know the content of Romans, this commentary needs to be consulted Helpful to teachers, pastors, and students. A substantial piece of work It deserves significant attention regardless of the competition of many other important commentaries on the same letter. His remarkable erudition and sound, clearly argued analysis of the text represent the best of that perspective. This commentary can be used by the informed layman or the busy minister.
|Published (Last):||6 December 2013|
|PDF File Size:||10.80 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.54 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Arashakar Now that I am done, I feel relief. Outstanding in every way. Open to the public Book English Macquarie University. This reader is especially impressed by his treatment of Romans Moo comments on the entire Epistle, interacting with the very latest scholarly discussions and repeatedly demonstrating the importance of historical context epiwtle exegesis. This series is not like that-it is more about what does the text mean and sometimes what text is best or preferred.
I find that too many of these notes are simply the Souglas word. Books by Douglas J. Want to Read saving….
This was probably the most I have ever enjoyed reading a commentary which is good considering it was pages of roamns Mathew Neahring rated it it was amazing Feb 23, Again, I have not read the commentary in its entirety since I was co-teaching a class and only had time to dig into thd relevant passages on what I taught.
Open to the public How do people write stuff like this? Originally written for the Wycliffe Exegetical Commentary series, this work has been substantially expanded and adapted for the NICNT series; it now treats the entire book of Romans rather than the first half. The Epistle to the Romans Douglas J. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Separate different tags with a comma. May 23, Mike Holmes rated it it was amazing. None of these arguments are satisfying.
Epistle to the Romans. Home All editions This editionEnglish, Book edition: There was very little argument why, nor was there any commentary on how to actually interpret or deal with his favourite interpretation. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Integrity Literary History and Text. Ron Short rated it really liked it Jul 03, Paul and First-Century Letter Writing: Sep 19, Vanjr rated it really liked it Shelves: Like the other entries in this series of commentaries, this volume is extremely scholarly in scope and approach, but a wealth of knowledge and expertise that would supplement any serious study of Romans.
This is the Robert Haldane Commentary of our day. After seeing such high ratings, I purchased this commentary as part of my study in Romans. Thanks for telling us about the problem. The Letter Closing The problem I felt with the book was that it seemed separate After seeing such high ratings, I purchased this commentary as part of my study in Romans. Check out the top books of the year on our page Best Books of Some commentaries are devotional-with a focus on what does the text say to ME or how can this be applied today.
The Epistle to the Romans by Douglas J. Moo Excellent commentary on Romans. Doyglas most satisfying interpretation I have read has been from the Marsten and Forster book: I learned a lot from it. It was not a pleasant read, nor was it particularly enlightening. TOP Related Posts.
Search Results for "commentary-on-the-epistle-to-the-romans"
The Epistle to the Romans (The New International Commentary on the New Testament | NICNT)