These vary with time and regional divisions, but "headbanger" and "metalhead" are universally accepted to refer to fans or the subculture itself. Subculture[ edit ] Heavy metal fans have created a "subculture of alienation" with its own standards for achieving authenticity within the group. Attending concerts affirms the solidarity of the subculture, as it is one of the ritual activities by which fans celebrate their music. Some metal fans may have short hair and dress in regular clothes. Authenticity[ edit ] In the musical subcultures of heavy metal and punk , authenticity is a core value.

Author:Gusida Gura
Language:English (Spanish)
Published (Last):5 August 2007
PDF File Size:17.90 Mb
ePub File Size:6.28 Mb
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Deena Weinstein, a professor of sociology, tackles here the music and its followers head on, to try and give outsiders a serious and accurate picture of such a misunderstood musical genre. Now, first published in , such description is obviously not innocent: glam metal exploded on MTV the whole previous decade, thrash is slowly emerging, and, above all, we are then barely years after the PMRC hearing and its political agenda tried to discredit and legislate the whole scene.

She is indeed far from being a clueless armchair intellectual, and it shows in how engaging she is all along. She displays a serious knowledge of a scene which is quite difficult to grasp for the noninitiate; and the way she sails through it all, steering the reader smoothly by being enlightening while debunking all the silly labellings death-obsessed, Satanists, sexual perverts, blah blah blah She acknowledges the complexity and skilful musicianship required to play such a style.

She, above all, nails fascinating points when it comes to describe its main features. Metal indeed was then more than a response to society at large, it was also both a reaction and an offshoot of the prevalent counterculture of the time that is, the hippie movement: to hell with love and flower power!

Hail to a new music that would be both Dionysian and Chaotic. Particularly interesting to me in any case was her discussion of the mass media in regards to its relationship with the music. As I said, this was first published in , and every metalhead will know such period to be crucial: not only commercial glam was decaying, but underground thrash was emerging.

MTV, here, makes for a case in point, that I found highly relevant not only to metal but music at large. For the mass commercial media, music is a product and a commodity, and the audience is merely an aggregate of listeners to be sold or delivered to sponsors.

The mass media will produce and play what their managers believe will get them the largest or most profitable audience. Commercial mass media had surely put it on the map glam made MTV but, being driven by profits, such success will cost the music a massive price: these media would, in turn, format the music so as to suit their own interests.

The consequences would be two fold: by constantly broadcasting the same type of repetitive, uncreative, formatted music over and over they overkilled the genre they were displaying while, on the other hand, many metalheads would find such dumping down and commercialisation such a betrayal of metal core roots that they would go underground, where thrash will emerge. Three decades later, glam, who had enjoyed the support of commercial mass media, is deader than dead; whereas thrash has richly evolved and fragmented into a multitude of extreme subgenres, still making the wealth of the metal scene.

Such analysis is therefore fascinating because, although we are talking here about metal, it applies in fact to any genre the mass medias put their claws on: turn on any musical channel, watch the cr. To conclude, what of the PMRC and its mediatic circus, then?




HEDS 5540 A11 PDF

Heavy metal subculture


Related Articles